Patient compliance to sublingual immunotherapy for mite-induced allergic rhinitis: A retrospective study

Abstract

Background: Compliance to sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) is generally low, resulting in reduced short- and long-term clinical efficacy. Compliance is a critical factor determining the success of allergic rhinitis (AR) treatment. Objective: To analyze the compliance of patients with house dust mite (HDM)-induced AR to SLIT and the impact of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) on compliance. Methods: The clinical data of 3117 patients with HDM-induced AR who started SLIT between July 2018 and April 2022 were retrospectively reviewed. We assessed the reasons for non-compliance and the changes in non-compliance during the COVID-19 pandemic compared to the pre-pandemic period. Results: Of 3117 patients, 507 (16.27%) patients (ages, 5–67 years) were identified as non-compliant. The most common reason for non-compliance was poor efficacy (27.22%). The non-compliance rate was highest during 24–36 months of SLIT (28.13%, 153/544), followed by 12–24 months (7.02%, 91/1296). Non-compliance was significantly higher in adolescents/adults than in children (P = 0.000). Although the generalized linear model analysis indicated that compliance was affected by the COVID-19 pandemic during 3–6 months of SLIT, the overall compliance to SLIT was not significantly affected by the pandemic, according to the Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. Conclusions: The non-compliance rate of SLIT in this study was low, and poor efficacy was the most common reason for non-compliance. The compliance of adolescents/adults was lower than that of children. The COVID-19 pandemic did not significantly impact compliance to SLIT, which is an appropriate strategy for the home treatment of AR patients during major public health events.

Keywords

• Allergic rhinitis
• Allergen immunotherapy
• Sublingual immunotherapy
• Compliance
• Patient education