Animal (Jul 2024)
Inseminate without hormonal treatment in dairy sheep farms: exploring the consequences on the sustainability of several contrasted production systems
Abstract
Alternatives to hormonal treatments (HTs) in dairy sheep reproduction management are being explored in response to increasing societal concerns regarding animal welfare and food safety. However, hormone-free reproduction implies higher variability in flock performances and additional constraints for timely synchronised artificial insemination (AI) in the flock, impacting the diffusion of genetic progress. The use of the male effect, a well-known practice to induce synchronised oestrus, combined with precision tools (e.g., heat detector), is a plausible way to implement AI without HT in dairy sheep farms. To date, the consequences of such alternative reproduction management on the whole farm sustainability remain unknown. To anticipate these potential impacts, a multiagent model (REPRIN’OV) was used to simulate dairy sheep farms’ sustainability indicators (biotechnical, economic, environmental and workload). A reproduction management scenario, including the use of the male effect followed by AI on the adult ewes (HFAI), was simulated and compared to the current reproduction management of four case study farms (Early_conv, Late_conv, Early_org and Late_org). They were selected to represent the different agricultural models (Conventional or Organic) and reproduction seasons (Early − during spring, out of ewes’ natural reproduction season − or Late −from early summer to the end of autumn) of the Roquefort Basin’s farms in Southern France. Simulation results showed that the HFAI scenario had different consequences depending on the farm’s production system type. A negative effect on most key sustainability indicators of the Conv farms was observed, as a significant reduction in the fertility rate, in the proportion of young ewes born from AI (−54% in both farms; P < 0.05) and in the flock’s milk production were observed; while the workload and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions were increased compared to the initial scenario. In the Org farms, HFAI had neutral to positive effects on most indicators as the fertility, milk production of the flock, workload during milking and GHG emissions were barely affected by this scenario, while an increase in the proportion of young ewes born from AI was observed (+39% and + 43% in each farm, respectively; P < 0.05), allowing a better farm gross margin. Still, the workload during lambing was increased in Early_org (+18%; P < 0.05), as Early farms, tended to be more negatively impacted by HFAI than Late ones. Overall, our simulation approach provides interesting elements to exchange with stakeholders on how to progress towards a socially acceptable reproduction management system, for the dairy sheep sector.
