Analysis of Scholars' Comments on Breaking Through the Evaluation Criteria Based on"Four Only"

Abstract

[Purpose/Significance] The publication of policy documents of breaking through the evaluation criteria based on" only thesis, only professional title, only academic degree, only awards" and "only SCI " has triggered extensive discussions among academic researchers. Scholars' discussions are logical and thorough, which can be used as a reference for the further improvement of talent evaluation and institutional evaluation policies. [Methods/Process] This paper comprehensively adopted the literature research method, analyzed scholars' views and comments on policy documents, classified scholars' concerns, and proposed suggestions based on the current status of scientific research evaluation. [Results/Conclusions] The paper proposed to improve the classification and evaluation methods, promote the implementation of the representative work system, optimize the allocation of scientific research resources, strengthen the cultivation of domestic journals, establish a comprehensive evaluation system, and strengthen academic ethics supervision, in order to provide references for government decision-making.

Keywords

• breaking the four only|breaking the only sci|opinion analysis|policy recommendation|scientific evaluation