Frontiers in Medicine (Jun 2022)

Effectiveness of Perioperative Cardiopulmonary Rehabilitation in Patients With Lung Cancer Undergoing Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery

  • Wei-Hao Chao,
  • Wei-Hao Chao,
  • Sheng-Hui Tuan,
  • Sheng-Hui Tuan,
  • En-Kuei Tang,
  • En-Kuei Tang,
  • Yi-Ju Tsai,
  • Yi-Ju Tsai,
  • Jing-Hui Chung,
  • Guan-Bo Chen,
  • Ko-Long Lin,
  • Ko-Long Lin,
  • Ko-Long Lin,
  • Ko-Long Lin

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2022.900165
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 9

Abstract

Read online

ObjectivesPatients with lung cancer pose a high risk of morbidity and mortality after lung resection. Those who receive perioperative cardiopulmonary rehabilitation (PRCR) have better prognosis. Peak oxygen consumption (peak VO2), VO2 at the ventilatory threshold (VO2 at VT), and slope of minute ventilation to carbon dioxide production (VE/VCO2 slope) measured during pre-surgical cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) have prognostic values after lung resection. We aimed to investigate the influence of individualized PRCR on postoperative complications in patients undergoing video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) for lung cancer with different pre-surgical risks.MethodsThis was a retrospective study. We recruited 125 patients who underwent VATS for lung cancer between 2017 and 2021. CPET was administered before surgery to evaluate the risk level and PRCR was performed based on the individual risk level defined by peak VO2, VO2 at VT, and VE/VCO2 slope, respectively. The primary outcomes were intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital lengths of stay, endotracheal intubation time (ETT), and chest tube insertion time (CTT). The secondary outcomes were postoperative complications (PPCs), including subcutaneous emphysema, pneumothorax, pleural effusion, atelectasis, infection, and empyema.ResultsThree intergroup comparisons based on the risk level by peak VO2 (3 groups), VO2 at VT (2 groups), and VE/VCO2 slope (3 groups) were done. All of the comparisons showed no significant differences in both the primary and secondary outcomes (p = 0.061–0.910).ConclusionPatients with different risk levels showed comparable prognosis and PPCs after undergoing CPET-guided PRCR. PRCR should be encouraged in patients undergoing VATS for lung cancer.

Keywords