Frontiers in Human Neuroscience (May 2024)

Wearing a KN95/FFP2 facemask has no measureable effect on functional activity in a challenging working memory n-back task

  • Marie-Louise Montandon,
  • Sven Haller,
  • Sven Haller,
  • Sven Haller,
  • Sven Haller,
  • Cristelle Rodriguez,
  • François R. Herrmann,
  • Panteleimon Giannakopoulos,
  • Panteleimon Giannakopoulos

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2024.1374625
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 18

Abstract

Read online

IntroductionWide use of facemasks is one of the many consequences of the COVID-19 pandemic.MethodsWe used an established working memory n-back task in functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to explore whether wearing a KN95/FFP2 facemask affects overall performance and brain activation patterns. We provide here a prospective crossover design 3 T fMRI study with/without wearing a tight FFP2/KN95 facemask, including 24 community-dwelling male healthy control participants (mean age ± SD = 37.6 ± 12.7 years) performing a 2-back task. Data analysis was performed using the FSL toolbox, performing both task-related and functional connectivity independent component analyses.ResultsWearing an FFP2/KN95 facemask did not impact behavioral measures of the 2-back task (response time and number of errors). The 2-back task resulted in typical activations in working-memory related areas in both MASK and NOMASK conditions. There were no statistically significant differences in MASK versus NOMASK while performing the 2-back task in both task-related and functional connectivity fMRI analyses.ConclusionThe effect of wearing a tight FFP2/KN95 facemasks did not significantly affect working memory performance and brain activation patterns of functional connectivity.

Keywords