Comparison of Closed and Open Surgical Technique for Second to Fifth Metacarpal Shaft Fractures: A Multicenter, Retrospective Study in a Dutch City Population

Abstract

The aim of this study was to assess surgical treatment in metacarpal shaft fractures of the second to fifth ray to determine the functional outcomes and complications in open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) versus closed reduction and internal fixation (CRIF). This was a retrospective study that included patients with metacarpal shaft fractures of the second to fifth rays who were treated surgically between 1 January 2007 and 31 December 2019. Functional outcomes were scored using the QuickDASH and Eq5D score. A total of 231 treated patients were included. Single fractures were seen in 180 patients, and multiple fractures in 51 patients. ORIF was applied in 141 patients and CRIF in 90 patients. The functional outcomes were not significantly different between the groups. Complications were found in 41 (29%) of the ORIF patients and 15 (17%) of the CRIF patients. The functional outcomes after single or multiple metacarpal shaft fractures were similar in the ORIF and CRIF patients. ORIF showed significantly more complications, such as functional impairment and infections and a higher reoperation rate. In conclusion, CRIF is as safe as ORIF for the surgical treatment of metacarpal shaft fractures in terms of its functional outcome and slightly preferable due to its lower complication rate.

Keywords

• metacarpal fractures
• surgical treatment
• closed reduction internal fixation
• functional outcomes