Chinese Medical Journal (Jul 2022)

A trial of arbidol hydrochloride in adults with COVID-19

  • Jingya Zhao,
  • Jinnong Zhang,
  • Yang Jin,
  • Zhouping Tang,
  • Ke Hu,
  • Hui Sun,
  • Mengmeng Shi,
  • Qingyuan Yang,
  • Peiyu Gu,
  • Hongrong Guo,
  • Qi Li,
  • Haiying Zhang,
  • Chenghong Li,
  • Ming Yang,
  • Nian Xiong,
  • Xuan Dong,
  • Juanjuan Xu,
  • Fan Lin,
  • Tao Wang,
  • Chao Yang,
  • Bo Huang,
  • Jingyi Zhang,
  • Shi Chen,
  • Qiong He,
  • Min Zhou,
  • Jieming Qu,
  • Peifang Wei

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/CM9.0000000000002104
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 135, no. 13
pp. 1531 – 1538

Abstract

Read online

Abstract. Background:. To date, there is no effective medicine to treat coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), and the antiviral efficacy of arbidol in the treatment for COVID-19 remained equivocal and controversial. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of arbidol tablets in the treatment of COVID-19. Methods:. This was a prospective, open-label, controlled and multicenter investigator-initiated trial involving adult patients with confirmed severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection. Patients were stratified 1:2 to either standard-of-care (SOC) or SOC plus arbidol tablets (oral administration of 200 mg per time, three times a day for 14 days). The primary endpoint was negative conversion of SARS-CoV-2 within the first week. The rates and 95% confidential intervals were calculated for each variable. Results:. A total of 99 patients with laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection were enrolled; 66 were assigned to the SOC plus arbidol tablets group, and 33 to the SOC group. The negative conversion rate of SARS-CoV-2 within the first week in patients receiving arbidol tablets was significantly higher than that of the SOC group (70.3% [45/64] vs. 42.4% [14/33]; difference of conversion rate 27.9%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 7.7%–48.1%; P = 0.008). Compared to those in the SOC group, patients receiving arbidol tablets had a shorter duration of clinical recovery (median 7.0 days vs. 12.0 days; hazard ratio [HR]: 1.877, 95% CI: 1.151–3.060, P = 0.006), symptom of fever (median 3.0 days vs. 12.0 days; HR: 18.990, 95% CI: 5.350–67.410, P 0.05). The most common adverse event in the arbidol tablets group was the elevation of transaminase (5/200, 2.5%), and no one withdrew from the study due to adverse events or disease progression. Conclusions:. SOC plus arbidol tablets significantly increase the negative conversion rate of SARS-CoV-2 within the first week and accelerate the recovery of COVID-19 patients. During the treatment with arbidol tablets, we find no significant serious adverse events. Trial registration:. Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, NCT04260594, www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04260594?term=NCT04260594&draw=2&rank=1