GMS Journal for Medical Education (Feb 2017)

Accepted standards on how to give a Medical Research Presentation: a systematic review of expert opinion papers

  • Blome, Christine,
  • Sondermann, Hanno,
  • Augustin, Matthias

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3205/zma001088
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 34, no. 1
p. Doc11

Abstract

Read online

Background: This systematic review aimed to extract recommendations from expert opinion articles on how to give a medical research presentation on a scientific conference and to determine whether the experts agree on what makes an effective or poor presentation. Methods: Presentation-related terms were searched within article titles listed in PubMed, restricting the search to English-language articles published from January 1975 to July 2015. Recommendations were extracted from the articles, grouped by content, and analyzed for frequency. Ninety-one articles were included. Among 679 different recommendations, 29 were given in more than 20% of articles each. The five most frequent recommendations were to keep slides simple, adjust the talk to the audience, rehearse, not read the talk from slides or a manuscript, and make eye contact. Results: No article gave advice that was the complete opposite of the 29 most frequent recommendations with the exception of whether a light or dark background should be used for slides. Conclusions: Researchers should comply with these widely accepted standards to be perceived as effective presenters.

Keywords