Environmental Research Communications (Jan 2024)

From consumption to context: assessing poverty and inequality across diverse socio-ecological systems in Ghana

  • Alicia C Cavanaugh,
  • Honor R Bixby,
  • Saeesh Mangwani,
  • Samuel Agyei-Mensah,
  • Cynthia Azochiman Awuni,
  • Jill C Baumgartner,
  • George Owusu,
  • Brian E Robinson

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1088/2515-7620/ad76ff
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 6, no. 9
p. 091009

Abstract

Read online

Local social and ecological contexts influence the experience of poverty and inequality in a number of ways that include shaping livelihood opportunities and determining the available infrastructure, services and environmental resources, as well as people’s capacity to use them. The metrics used to define poverty and inequality function to guide local and international development policy but how these interact with the local ecological contexts is not well explored. We use a social-ecological systems (SES) lens to empirically examine how context relates to various measures of human well-being at a national scale in Ghana. Using a novel dataset constructed from the 100% Ghanian Census, we examine poverty and inequality at a fine population level across and within multiple dimensions of well-being. First, we describe how well-being varies within different Ghanian SES contexts. Second, we ask whether monetary consumption acts a good indicator for well-being across these contexts. Third, we examine measures of inequality in various metrics across SES types. We find consumption distributions differ across SES types and are markedly distinct from regional distributions based on political boundaries. Rates of improved well-being are positively correlated with consumption levels in all SES types, but correlations are weaker in less-developed contexts like, rangelands and wildlands. Finally, while consumption inequality is quite consistent across SES types, inequality in other measures of living standards (housing, water, sanitation, etc) increases dramatically in SES types as population density and infrastructural development decreases. We advocate that SES types should be recognized as distinct contexts in which actions to mitigate poverty and inequality should better incorporate the challenges unique to each.

Keywords