BMJ Open (Apr 2022)

COVID-19 advanced respiratory care educational training programme for healthcare workers in Lesotho: an observational study

  • Eric D McCollum,
  • Bhakti Hansoti,
  • Valerie O Osula,
  • Jill E Sanders,
  • Tafadzwa Chakare,
  • Lucy Mapota-Masoabi,
  • Makhoase Ranyali-Otubanjo

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-058643
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 12, no. 4

Abstract

Read online

Objective To develop and implement a ‘low-dose, high-frequency’ (LDHF) advanced respiratory care training programme for COVID-19 care in Lesotho.Design Prospective pretraining–post-training evaluation.Setting Lesotho has limited capacity in advanced respiratory care.Participants Physicians and nurses.Interventions Due to limited participation in May–September 2020, the LDHF approach was modified into a traditional 1-day offsite training in November 2020 that reviewed respiratory anatomy and physiology, clinical principles for conventional oxygen, heated high-flow nasal cannula and non-invasive ventilation management. Basic mechanical ventilation principles were introduced.Outcome measures Participants completed a 20-question multiple choice examination immediately before and after the 1-day training. Paired t-tests were used to evaluate the difference in average participant pretraining and post-training examination scores.Results Pretraining and post-training examinations were completed by 46/53 (86.7%) participants, of whom 93.4% (n=43) were nurses. The overall mean pretraining score was 44.8% (SD 12.4%). Mean scores improved by an average of 23.7 percentage points (95% CI 19.7 to 27.6, p<0.001) on the post-training examination to a mean score of 68.5% (SD 13.6%). Performance on basic and advanced respiratory categories also improved by 17.7 (95% CI 11.6 to 23.8) and 25.6 percentage points (95% CI 20.4 to 30.8) (p<0.001). Likewise, mean examination scores increased on the post-training test, compared with pretraining, for questions related to respiratory management (29.6 percentage points, 95% CI 24.1 to 35.0) and physiology (17.4 percentage points, 95% CI 12.0 to 22.8).Conclusions An LDHF training approach was not feasible during this early emergency period of the COVID-19 pandemic in Lesotho. Despite clear knowledge gains, the modest post-training examination scores coupled with limited physician engagement suggest healthcare workers require alternative educational strategies before higher advanced care like mechanical ventilation is implementable. Conventional and high-flow oxygen is better aligned with post-training healthcare worker knowledge levels and rapid implementation.