Cancer Cell International (Aug 2024)

Comprehensive analysis, diagnosis, prognosis, and cordycepin (CD) regulations for GSDME expressions in pan-cancers

  • Jiewen Fu,
  • Dabing Li,
  • Lianmei Zhang,
  • Mazaher Maghsoudloo,
  • Jingliang Cheng,
  • Junjiang Fu

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12935-024-03467-2
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 24, no. 1
pp. 1 – 14

Abstract

Read online

Abstract The Gasdermin E gene (GSDME) plays roles in deafness and cancers. However, the roles and mechanisms in cancers are complex, and the same gene exhibits different mechanisms and actions in different types of cancers. Online databases, such as GEPIA2, cBioPortal, and DNMIVD, were used to comprehensively analyze GSDME profiles, DNA methylations, mutations, diagnosis, and prognosis in patients with tumor tissues and matched healthy tissues. Western blotting and RT-PCR were used to monitor the regulation of GSDME by Cordycepin (CD) in cancer cell lines. We revealed that GSDME expression is significantly upregulated in eight cancers (ACC, DLBC, GBM, HNSC, LGG, PAAD, SKCM, and THYM) and significantly downregulated in seven cancers (COAD, KICH, LAML, OV, READ, UCES, and UCS). The overall survival was longer only in ACC, but shorter in four cancers, including COAD, KIRC, LIHC, and STAD, when GSDME was highly expressed in cancers compared with the corresponding normal tissues. Moreover, the high expression of GSDME was negatively correlated with the poor prognosis of ACC, while the low expression of GSDME was negatively correlated with the poor prognosis of COAD, suggesting that GSDME might serve as a good prognostic factor in these two cancer types. Accordingly, results indicated that the DNA methylations of those 7 CpG sites constitute a potentially effective signature to distinguish different tumors from adjacent healthy tissues. Gene mutations for GSDME were frequently observed in a variety of tumors, with UCES having the highest frequency. Moreover, CD treatment inhibited GSDME expression in different cancer cell lines, while overexpression of GSDME promoted cell migration and invasion. Thus, we have systematically and successfully clarified the GSDME expression profiles, diagnostic values, and prognostic values in pan-cancers. Targeting GSDME with CD implies therapeutic significance and a mechanism for antitumor roles in some types of cancers via increasing the sensitivity of chemotherapy. Altogether, our study may provide a strategy and biomarker for clinical diagnosis, prognostics, and treatment of cancers by targeting GSDME.

Keywords