BMC Gastroenterology (Jan 2012)

Validation of the FIB4 index in a Japanese nonalcoholic fatty liver disease population

  • Sumida Yoshio,
  • Yoneda Masato,
  • Hyogo Hideyuki,
  • Itoh Yoshito,
  • Ono Masafumi,
  • Fujii Hideki,
  • Eguchi Yuichiro,
  • Suzuki Yasuaki,
  • Aoki Noriaki,
  • Kanemasa Kazuyuki,
  • Fujita Koji,
  • Chayama Kazuaki,
  • Saibara Toshiji,
  • Kawada Norifumi,
  • Fujimoto Kazuma,
  • Kohgo Yutaka,
  • Yoshikawa Toshikazu,
  • Okanoue Takeshi

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-230X-12-2
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 12, no. 1
p. 2

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Background A reliable and inexpensive noninvasive marker of hepatic fibrosis is required in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). FIB4 index (based on age, aspartate aminotransferase [AST] and alanine aminotransferase [ALT] levels, and platelet counts) is expected to be useful for evaluating hepatic fibrosis. We validated the performance of FIB4 index in a Japanese cohort with NAFLD. Methods The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUROC) for FIB4 and six other markers were compared, based on data from 576 biopsy-proven NAFLD patients. Advanced fibrosis was defined as stage 3-4 fibrosis. FIB4 index was assessed as: age (yr) × AST (IU/L)/(platelet count (109/L) × √ALT (IU/L)) Results Advanced fibrosis was found in 64 (11%) patients. The AUROC for FIB4 index was superior to those for the other scoring systems for differentiating between advanced and mild fibrosis. Only 6 of 308 patients with a FIB4 index below the proposed low cut-off point ( 3.25) were over-staged, giving a low positive predictive value of 53%. Using these cutoffs, 91% of the 395 patients with FIB-4 values outside 1.45-3.25 would be correctly classified. Implementation of the FIB4 index in the Japanese population would avoid 58% of liver biopsies. Conclusion The FIB4 index was superior to other tested noninvasive markers of fibrosis in Japanese patients with NAFLD, with a high negative predictive value for excluding advanced fibrosis. The small number of cases of advanced fibrosis in this cohort meant that this study had limited power for validating the high cut-off point.