Endoscopy International Open (Mar 2018)

Risk factors for post-colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) coagulation syndrome: a multicenter, prospective, observational study

  • Jun Arimoto,
  • Takuma Higurashi,
  • Shingo Kato,
  • Akiko Fuyuki,
  • Hidenori Ohkubo,
  • Takashi Nonaka,
  • Yoshikazu Yamaguchi,
  • Keiichi Ashikari,
  • Hideyuki Chiba,
  • Shungo Goto,
  • Masataka Taguri,
  • Takashi Sakaguchi,
  • Kazuhiro Atsukawa,
  • Atsushi Nakajima

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0044-101451
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 06, no. 03
pp. E342 – E349

Abstract

Read online

Background and study aims Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most common neoplasms and endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is an effective treatment for early-stage CRC. However, it has been observed that patients undergoing ESD often complain of pain, even if ESD has been successfully performed. Risk factors for such pain still remain unknown. The aim of this study was to explore the risk factors for post-colorectal ESD coagulation syndrome (PECS). Patients and methods This was a prospective multicenter observational trial (UMIN000016781) conducted in 106 of 223 patients who underwent ESD between March 2015 and April 2016. We investigated age, sex, tumor location, ESD operation time, lesion size, duration of hospitalization, and frequency of PECS. We defined PECS as local abdominal pain (evaluated on a visual analogue scale) in the region corresponding to the site of the ESD that occurred within 4 days of the procedure. Results PECS occurred in 15/106 (14.2 %), and 10 were women (P = 0.01, OR: 7.74 [1.6 – 36.4]), 7 had lesions in the cecum (P 90 min (P = 0.002, OR: 10.3 [2.4 – 44.6]). Frequency of deviation from the prescribed clinical path was significantly higher (47 % [7/15] vs. 2 % [2/91], P 90 minutes were significant risk factors independent of PECS. These findings are important to management of PECS.