Agriculture (Apr 2022)

Interaction Simulation of Vadose Zone Water and Groundwater in Cele Oasis: Assessment of the Impact of Agricultural Intensification, Northwestern China

  • Dongping Xue,
  • Heng Dai,
  • Yi Liu,
  • Yunfei Liu,
  • Lei Zhang,
  • Wengai Lv

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture12050641
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 12, no. 5
p. 641

Abstract

Read online

Agricultural intensification has boosted land productivity, but it has also created new sustainability issues. As one of the most important human habitations and agricultural farming areas in arid areas, the Cele Oasis has a very developed agricultural system. This paper studies the long-term effects of different types of agricultural intensification strategies on groundwater level fluctuations in the Cele Oasis. A soil water flow (HYDRUS-1D) and aquifer simulation (MODFLOW) coupling model were used to construct the geometric structures of the vadose zone and saturated zone in the Cele Oasis and to analyze the recharge and discharge mechanism of the oasis. The results showed that HYDRUS-1D accurately simulated soil moisture transport in the Cele Oasis, providing reliable data for calibration of the MODFLOW model. The groundwater level simulated by MODFLOW was in good agreement with the observed value. The results of the R2, RMSE, and NSE were ranges of 0.77–0.90, 0.45–0.74 m, and 0.76–0.87, respectively. The errors were acceptable limits. The coupling model predicted the responses of different agricultural types and cropping scenarios to groundwater. Predictions showed that the groundwater level in the Cele Oasis remained stable under the current cropping scenario (100% cropping intensity), and that the groundwater level decreased slightly under the cropping scenario (110% cropping intensity and 130% cropping intensity). When the cropping scenario was at 170% cropping intensity, the groundwater level decreased rapidly, and the maximum drawdown value was 7 m. Therefore, the maximum cropping intensity of the Cele Oasis in the future should be 130% of the current cropping intensity.

Keywords