Terrain analysis in forested areas: consequences of using DSM instead of DTM

Abstract

Relief mapping through dense tropical forest is a challenge, which can be met by processing radar images. Various global digital elevation models (DEMs) are available, either free or paid, the most widely used methods for producing them at global scale being photogrammetry and short wavelength radar interferometry. However, the resulting DEMs do not directly represent the ground surface but rather the canopy or something in between. Since most users need terrain models for a variety of applications in geoscience, water management etc. but use such canopy models for lack of anything better, it was relevant to assess the consequences of this inappropriate but unavoidable choice. This paper presents a study carried out in the Brazilian Amazon, where an airborne P-band radar interferometric DEM was used as a reference based on its accuracy assessed in previous studies. A well-established DEM (SRTM) and newer ones (Copernicus and Fabdem), as well as a DEM obtained from aerial X-bands radar data, were compared to the reference according to different criteria related to elevation (accuracy and a typical application, i.e., dam filling simulation) and to slope at different scales (accuracy and a typical application, i.e., terrain classification). The results highlighted the risks of using short wavelengths to represent the terrain and emphasized the importance of slope in different resolution scales.