SSM: Population Health (Mar 2023)

Neighborhood disadvantage and the risk of dementia and mortality among refugees to Denmark: A quasi-experimental study

  • Min Hee Kim,
  • Else Foverskov,
  • Trine Frøslev,
  • Justin S. White,
  • M. Maria Glymour,
  • Jens Hainmueller,
  • Lars Pedersen,
  • Henrik T. Sørensen,
  • Rita Hamad

Journal volume & issue
Vol. 21
p. 101312

Abstract

Read online

Objectives: Neighborhood disadvantage may increase the risk of adverse health outcomes among older refugees. Yet few studies rigorously estimate the effects of place-based factors on later-life health, particularly dementia and mortality. Evidence about refugees is especially sparse. Methods: This study leveraged a natural experiment in the form of a Danish policy (1986–1998) that dispersed refugees quasi-randomly across neighborhoods upon arrival. We used longitudinal registers allowing 30 years of follow-up among refugees aged 40+ years upon arrival in Denmark (N = 9,854). Cox models assessed the association between neighborhood disadvantage and risk of dementia and mortality. We examined heterogeneous effects by sex, age, and family size. We also examined associations among non-refugee immigrants and native-born Danes. Results: Neighborhood disadvantage was not associated with dementia in any group. One unit increase in neighborhood disadvantage index (ranges −8 to 5.7) was associated with greater mortality risk among non-refugee immigrants (HR 1.06, 95%CI: 1.02, 1.10) and native-born Danes (HR 1.11, 95%CI: 1.06, 1.17). In contrast, neighborhood disadvantage was associated with lower mortality risk among refugees (HR 0.96, 95%CI: 0.93, 0.99). Neighborhood disadvantage remained negatively associated with mortality risk in subgroups: refugees who are female (on moderate-disadvantage compared to low-disadvantage), aged 60+, and who arrived with families. Discussion: While neighborhood disadvantage was associated with lower mortality risk among refugees, it was associated with greater mortality risk among non-refugee immigrants and native-born Danes, perhaps due to confounding in the latter groups or different place-based experiences by immigration status. Future research is warranted to explain the reasons for contrasting findings.

Keywords