Pharmacology Research & Perspectives (May 2021)

Exposure–response modeling of peficitinib efficacy in patients with rheumatoid arthritis

  • Junko Toyoshima,
  • Atsunori Kaibara,
  • Mai Shibata,
  • Yuichiro Kaneko,
  • Hiroyuki Izutsu,
  • Tetsuya Nishimura

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/prp2.744
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 9, no. 3
pp. n/a – n/a

Abstract

Read online

Abstract The aim was to analyze the relationship between peficitinib exposure and efficacy response according to American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20 criteria and 28‐joint disease activity score based on C‐reactive protein (DAS28‐CRP) in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients, and to identify relevant covariates by developing exposure–response models. The analysis incorporated results from three multicenter, placebo‐controlled, double‐blind studies. As an exposure parameter, individual post hoc pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters were obtained from a previously constructed population PK model. Longitudinal ACR20 response rate and individual longitudinal DAS28‐CRP measurements were modeled by a non‐linear mixed effect model. Influential covariates were explored, and their effects on efficacy were quantitatively assessed and compared. The exposure–response models of effect of peficitinib on duration‐dependent increase in ACR20 response rate and decrease in DAS28‐CRP were adequately described by a continuous time Markov model and an indirect response model, respectively, with a sigmoidal Emax saturable of drug exposure in RA patients. The significant covariates were DAS28‐CRP and total bilirubin at baseline for the ACR20 response model, and CRP at baseline and concomitant methotrexate treatment for the DAS28–CRP model. The covariate effects were highly consistent between the two models. Our exposure–response models of peficitinib in RA patients satisfactorily described duration‐dependent improvements in ACR20 response rates and DAS28‐CRP measurements, and provided consistent covariate effects. Only the ACR20 model incorporated a patient's subjective high expectations just after the start of the treatment. Therefore, due to their similarities and differences, both models may have relevant applications in the development of RA treatment. Clinical trial registration NCT01649999 (RAJ1), NCT02308163 (RAJ3), NCT02305849 (RAJ4).

Keywords