International Journal of Infectious Diseases (Dec 2023)

Umbilical cord clamping in the early phases of the COVID-19 era – a systematic review and meta-analysis of reported practice and recommendations in guidelines

  • Johan Henrik Martin Berg,
  • Li Thies-Lagergren,
  • Jenny Svedenkrans,
  • Jeremiah Samkutty,
  • Sara Marie Larsson,
  • Judith S. Mercer,
  • Heike Rabe,
  • Ola Andersson,
  • Mehreen Zaigham

Journal volume & issue
Vol. 137
pp. 63 – 70

Abstract

Read online

Objectives: At the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, delayed umbilical cord clamping (CC) at birth may have been commonly discouraged despite a lack of convincing evidence of mother-to-neonate SARS-CoV-2 transmission. We aimed to systematically review guidelines, and reports of practice and to analyze associations between timing of CC and mother-to-neonate SARS-CoV-2 transmission during the early phases of the pandemic. Methods: Major databases were searched from December 1, 2019, to July 20, 2021. Inclusion: studies and guidelines describing CC practice in women with SARS-CoV-2 infection during pregnancy until 2 postnatal days, giving birth to live-born neonates. Exclusion: no extractable data. Two reviewers independently screened studies for eligibility and assessed study quality. Pooled prevalence rates were calculated. Results: Forty-eight studies (1476 neonates) and 40 guidelines were included. Delayed CC was recommended in 70.0% of the guidelines. Nevertheless, delayed CC was reported less often than early CC: 262/1476 (17.8%) vs 511/1476 (34.6%). Neonatal SARS-CoV-2 positivity rates were similar following delayed (1.2%) and early CC (1.3%). Most SARS-CoV-2 transmissions (93.3%) occurred in utero. Conclusion: Delayed CC did not seem to increase mother-to-neonate SARS-CoV-2 transmission. Due to its benefits, it should be encouraged even in births where the mother has a SARS-CoV-2 infection. Systematic review registration: Prospero CRD42020199500.

Keywords