Kidney Medicine (Jun 2024)

Informed Dialysis Modality Selection Among Veterans With Advanced CKD: A Community-Level Needs Assessment

  • Gajapathiraju Chamarthi,
  • Tatiana Orozco,
  • Jennifer Hale-Gallardo,
  • Shobha Subhash,
  • Popy Shell,
  • Kailyn Pearce,
  • Huanguang Jia,
  • Ashutosh M. Shukla

Journal volume & issue
Vol. 6, no. 6
p. 100832

Abstract

Read online

Rationale & Objective: The Advancing Americans Kidney Health Executive order has directed substantial increases in home dialysis use for incident kidney replacement therapy (KRT). Clinical guidelines recommend patients’ self-selection of KRT modality through a shared decision-making process, which, at the minimum, requires predialysis nephrology care and KRT-directed comprehensive prekidney failure patient education (CoPE). The current state of these essential services among Americans with advanced (stages 4 and 5) chronic kidney disease (CKD) and their informed preferences for home dialysis are unknown. Study Design: We conducted a community-based, cross-sectional, observational cohort study across a large regional Veteran Healthcare System from October 1, 2020, to September 30, 2021. Setting & Participants: Of the 928 Veterans with advanced CKD, 287 (30.9%) were invited for needs assessment evaluations. Of the 218 (76% of invited cohort) responding, 178 (81.6%) were receiving nephrology care, with approximately half of those (43.6%) receiving such care from non-Veterans Affairs providers. Outcomes: The study was targeted to assess the prevalent state of ongoing nephrology care and KRT-directed pre-kidney failure education among Veterans with advanced CKD. The secondary outcome included evaluation of dialysis decision-making state among Veterans with advanced CKD. Analytical Approach: Veterans with advanced CKD with 2 sustained estimated glomerular filtration rates <30 mL/min/1.73 m2 were identified through an electronic database query, and a randomly selected cohort was invited for their current state of and outstanding needs for predialysis nephrology care and CoPE, essential for informed KRT selection. Results: Basic awareness of kidney disease was high (92.2%) among Veterans with advanced CKD, although only 38.5% were aware of the severity of their CKD. KRT-directed education during clinical care was reported by 46.8% of Veterans, of which 21.1% reported having received targeted CoPE classes. Three-quarters (74.3%) of Veterans expressed interest in receiving CoPE services. Overall, awareness of CKD and its severity and receipt of KRT-directed education were significantly higher among Veterans with nephrology care than among those without. Of the 61 Veterans providing their KRT preferences, overall decision making was poor, with three-quarters (73.8%) of the cohort unable to choose any KRT modality, irrespective of ongoing nephrology care. Only 8 (13%) felt confident choosing home KRT modalities. Limitations: The study results are primarily applicable to the Veterans with advanced CKD. Furthermore, a limited numbers of respondents provided data on their KRT decision-making state, prohibiting broad generalizations. Conclusions: In a first-of-its-kind community-based needs assessment evaluation among Veterans with advanced CKD, we found that awareness of kidney disease is positively associated with nephrology care; however, the informed KRT selection capabilities are universally poor, irrespective of nephrology care. Our results demonstrate a critical gap between the recommended and prevalent nephrology practices such as KRT-directed education and targeted CoPE classes required for informed patient-centered home dialysis selection in advanced CKD. Plain-Language Summary: The Advancing American Kidney Health Executive Order recommended substantial, potentially unrealistic increases in societal home dialysis use. Unfortunately, we have not examined patient preferences for these targets to guide health care policies. Conducting a community-level needs assessment study among Veterans with advanced kidney disease, we found significant deficits in basic clinical care, namely the specialty nephrology care and dialysis-directed patient education services essential for informed patient-centered dialysis selection. This was expectedly associated with a suboptimal state of dialysis decision making, with about three-quarters of those surveyed being unable to select any dialysis modality. Our results show a critical need for provider and system-level efforts to ensure universal availability of specialty kidney care and targeted education for all patients with advanced chronic kidney disease.

Keywords