Frontiers in Oncology (May 2021)

Enhancing the Screening Efficiency of Breast Cancer by Combining Conventional Medical Imaging Examinations With Circulating Tumor Cells

  • Yang Gao,
  • Yang Gao,
  • Wan-Hung Fan,
  • Chaohui Duan,
  • Wenhe Zhao,
  • Jun Zhang,
  • Xixiong Kang,
  • Xixiong Kang

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2021.643003
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 11

Abstract

Read online

PurposeUltrasound (US) and mammogram (MMG) are the two most common breast cancer (BC) screening tools. This study aimed to assess how the combination of circulating tumor cells (CTC) with US and MMG would improve the diagnostic performance.MethodsCTC detection and imaging examinations, US and MMG, were performed in 238 treatment-naive BC patients, 217 patients with benign breast diseases (BBD), and 20 healthy females. Correlations of CTC, US and MMG with patients’ clinicopathological characteristics were evaluated. Diagnostic performances of CTC, US and MMG were estimated by the receiver operating characteristic curves.ResultsCTC, US and MMG could all distinguish BC patients from the control (p < 0.0001). Area under curve (AUC) of CTC, US and MMG are 0.855, 0.861 and 0.759, respectively. While US has the highest sensitivity of 0.79, CTC and MMG have the same specificity of 0.92. Notably, CTC has the highest accuracy of 0.83. Combination with CTC increases the AUC of US and MMG to 0.922 and 0.899, respectively. Combining MMG with CTC or US increases the sensitivity of MMG to 0.87, however “CTC + MMG” has a higher specificity of 0.85. “CTC + US” performs the best in BC diagnosis, followed by “CTC + MMG” and then “US + MMG”.ConclusionCTC can be used as a diagnostic aid for BC screening. Combination with CTC increases the diagnostic potency of conventional BC screening imaging examinations, US and MMG, in BC diagnosis, especially for MMG.

Keywords