Journal of Clinical Medicine (Aug 2022)

Low Anterior Resection Syndrome: What Have We Learned Assessing a Large Population?

  • Audrius Dulskas,
  • Povilas Kavaliauskas,
  • Edgaras Kulikauskas,
  • Edgaras Smolskas,
  • Kornelija Pumputiene,
  • Narimantas E. Samalavicius,
  • Joseph W. Nunoo-Mensah

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11164752
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 11, no. 16
p. 4752

Abstract

Read online

Our goal was to assess the rate of symptoms commonly included in LARS score in a large general population. The study was based on a population-based design. We disseminated LARS scores through community online platforms and general practitioners throughout Lithuania. We received 8183 responses to the questionnaire. There were 142 (1.74%) participants who were excluded for lack of information. There were 6100 (75.9%) females and 1941 (24.1%) males. After adjusting for sex and age, male participants had a significant average score of 18.4 (SD ± 10.35) and female 20.3 (SD ± 9.74) p p p = 0.018, SI 1.2–2.1) and 1.28 (p = 0.018, SI 1.07–1.53), respectively. The symptoms included in the LARS score are common in the general population, and there is a variety of factors that influence this, including previous surgeries, age, sex, comorbidities, and medication. These factors should be considered when interpreting the LARS score following low anterior resection and when considering treatment options preoperatively.

Keywords