Stem Cell Research & Therapy (Apr 2024)

Treatment of COVID-19-associated ARDS with umbilical cord-derived mesenchymal stromal cells in the STROMA-CoV-2 multicenter randomized double-blind trial: long-term safety, respiratory function, and quality of life

  • Alexandre Sitbon,
  • Caroline Hauw-Berlemont,
  • Miryam Mebarki,
  • Nicholas Heming,
  • Julien Mayaux,
  • Jean-Luc Diehl,
  • Alexandre Demoule,
  • Djillali Annane,
  • Clémence Marois,
  • Sophie Demeret,
  • Emmanuel Weiss,
  • Guillaume Voiriot,
  • Muriel Fartoukh,
  • Jean‐Michel Constantin,
  • Bruno Mégarbane,
  • Gaëtan Plantefève,
  • Hélène Boucher-Pillet,
  • Guillaume Churlaud,
  • Audrey Cras,
  • Camille Maheux,
  • Chloé Pezzana,
  • Mamadou Hassimiou Diallo,
  • Said Lebbah,
  • Jacques Ropers,
  • Joe-Elie Salem,
  • Christian Straus,
  • Philippe Menasché,
  • Jérôme Larghero,
  • Antoine Monsel,
  • APHP STROMA–CoV‐2 Collaborative Research Group

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13287-024-03729-w
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 15, no. 1
pp. 1 – 9

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Background The STROMA-CoV-2 study was a French phase 2b, multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial that did not identify a significant efficacy of umbilical cord-derived mesenchymal stromal cells in patients with SARS-CoV-2-induced acute respiratory distress syndrome. Safety on day 28 was found to be good. The aim of our extended study was to assess the 6- and 12-month safety of UC-MSCs administration in the STROMA-CoV-2 cohort. Methods A detailed multi-domain assessment was conducted at 6 and 12 months following hospital discharge focusing on adverse events, lung computed tomography-scan, pulmonary and muscular functional status, and quality of life in the STROMA-CoV-2 cohort including SARS–CoV-2-related early (< 96 h) mild‐to-severe acute respiratory distress syndrome. Results Between April 2020 and October 2020, 47 patients were enrolled, of whom 19 completed a 1-year follow-up. There were no significant differences in any endpoints or adverse effects between the UC-MSCs and placebo groups at the 6- and 12-month assessments. Ground-glass opacities persisted at 1 year in 5 patients (26.3%). Furthermore, diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide remained altered over 1 year, although no patient required oxygen or non-invasive ventilatory support. Quality of life revealed declines in mental, emotional and physical health throughout the follow-up period, and the six-minute walking distance remained slightly impaired at the 1-year patient assessment. Conclusions This study suggests a favorable safety profile for the use of intravenous UC-MSCs in the context of the first French wave of SARS-CoV-2-related moderate-to-severe acute respiratory distress syndrome, with no adverse effects observed at 1 year.

Keywords