The Astrophysical Journal (Jan 2024)

Study of Plasma Heating Processes in a Coronal Mass Ejection–driven Shock Sheath Region Observed with the Metis Coronagraph

  • Federica Frassati,
  • Alessandro Bemporad,
  • Salvatore Mancuso,
  • Silvio Giordano,
  • Vincenzo Andretta,
  • Aleksandr Burtovoi,
  • Vania Da Deppo,
  • Yara De Leo,
  • Silvano Fineschi,
  • Catia Grimani,
  • Salvo Guglielmino,
  • Petr Heinzel,
  • Giovanna Jerse,
  • Federico Landini,
  • Alessandro Liberatore,
  • Giampiero Naletto,
  • Gianalfredo Nicolini,
  • Maurizio Pancrazzi,
  • Paolo Romano,
  • Marco Romoli,
  • Giuliana Russano,
  • Clementina Sasso,
  • Daniele Spadaro,
  • Marco Stangalini,
  • Roberto Susino,
  • Luca Teriaca,
  • Michela Uslenghi,
  • Luca Zangrilli

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ad26fb
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 964, no. 1
p. 15

Abstract

Read online

On 2021 September 28, a C1.6 class flare occurred in active region NOAA 12871, located approximately at 27°S and 51°W on the solar disk with respect to Earth’s point of view. This event was followed by a partial halo coronal mass ejection (CME) that caused the deflection of preexisting coronal streamer structures, as observed in visible-light coronagraphic images. An associated type II radio burst was also detected by both space- and ground-based instruments, indicating the presence of a coronal shock propagating into interplanetary space. By using H i Ly α (121.6 nm) observations from the Metis coronagraph on board the Solar Orbiter mission, we demonstrate for the first time the capability of UV imaging to provide, via a Doppler dimming technique, an upper limit estimate of the evolution of the 2D proton kinetic temperature in the CME-driven shock sheath as it passes through the field of view of the instrument. Our results suggest that over the 22 minutes of observations, the shock propagated with a speed decreasing from about 740 ± 110 km s ^−1 to 400 ± 60 km s ^−1 . At the same time, the postshock proton temperatures peaked at latitudes around the shock nose and decreased with time from about 6.8 ± 1.01 MK to 3.1 ± 0.47 MK. The application of the Rankine–Hugoniot jump conditions demonstrates that these temperatures are higher by a factor of about 2–5 than those expected from simple adiabatic compression, implying that significant shock heating is still going on at these distances.

Keywords