Therapeutic Advances in Gastroenterology (Nov 2016)

The location of obstruction predicts stent occlusion in malignant gastric outlet obstruction

  • Douglas Grunwald,
  • Jonah Cohen,
  • Anthony Bartley,
  • Jennifer Sheridan,
  • Ram Chuttani,
  • Mandeep S. Sawhney,
  • Douglas K. Pleskow,
  • Tyler M. Berzin,
  • Meir Mizrahi

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/1756283X16667893
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 9

Abstract

Read online

Background: Gastric outlet obstruction (GOO) can occur with locally invasive or metastatic cancer involving the upper gastrointestinal tract at the pylorus or the duodenum. Endoscopic management with self-expanding metal stents (SEMSs) is often the preferred palliative approach. Stent occlusion is a common reason for failure and reintervention. We set out to determine whether the location of the malignant obstruction is associated with the angulation of the stent and can predict stent occlusion. Methods: We performed a retrospective review of consecutive patients who underwent successful duodenal stenting with SEMS for malignant GOO between 2006 and 2015 at a large advanced endoscopy referral center. We determined the location of obstruction, the stent angle, and the rate of technical and clinical success of stent placement. We then identified cases of subsequent stent occlusion confirmed by endoscopic evaluation. Results: A total of 100 consecutive patients were included in the study; 91 of these patients had enough data to evaluate SEMS occlusion. A total of 21 patients (23%) developed stent occlusion with a median time of 39 days. The risk of occlusion sequentially increased as the obstruction occurred more distally from the antrum to the third or fourth portion of the duodenum ( p = 0.006). This relationship was maintained after controlling for stent angle ( p = 0.05). Conclusions: A distal location of malignant GOO was strongly predictive of stent occlusion, independent of stent angle. This may be due to longer and more complex distal obstructions, along with foreshortening of the stent during placement and tumor infiltration. If replicated, these results will have implications for endoscopic practice and future device development.