End-Tidal Carbon Dioxide Pressure Measurement after Prolonged Inspiratory Time Gives a Good Estimation of the Arterial Carbon Dioxide Pressure in Mechanically Ventilated Patients

Abstract

Background: End-tidal carbon dioxide pressure (PetCO2) is unreliable for monitoring PaCO2 in several conditions because of the unpredictable value of the PaCO2–PetCO2 gradient. We hypothesised that increasing both the end-inspiratory pause and the expiratory time would reduce this gradient in patients ventilated for COVID-19 with Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome and in patients anaesthetised for surgery. Methods: On the occasion of an arterial blood gas sample, an extension in inspiratory pause was carried out either by recruitment manoeuvre or by extending the end-inspiratory pause to 10 s. The end-expired PCO2 was measured (expiratory time: 4 s) after this manoeuvre (PACO2) in comparison with the PetCO2 measured by the monitor. We analysed 67 Δ(a-et)CO2, Δ(a-A)CO2 pairs for 7 patients in the COVID group and for 27 patients in the anaesthesia group. Results are expressed as mean ± standard deviation. Results: Prolongation of the inspiratory pause significantly reduced PaCO2–PetCO2 gradients from 11 ± 5.7 and 5.7 ± 3.4 mm Hg (p 2–PACO2 gradients of −1.2 ± 3.3 (p = 0.043) and −1.9 ± 3.3 mm Hg (p 2 showed the lowest dispersion (−7 to +6 mm Hg) and better correlation with PaCO2 (R2 = 0.92). The PACO2 had a sensitivity of 0.81 and a specificity of 0.93 for identifying hypercapnic patients (PaCO2 > 50 mm Hg). Conclusions: Measuring end-tidal PCO2 after prolonged inspiratory time reduced the PaCO2–PetCO2 gradient to the point of obtaining values close to PaCO2. This measure identified hypercapnic patients in both intensive care and during anaesthesia.

Keywords

• carbon dioxide monitoring
• hypercapnia detection
• COVID-19
• ARDS
• mechanical ventilation
• CO₂ gradient