BMC Cancer (Oct 2022)

Lymphocyte to C-reactive protein ratio could better predict the prognosis of patients with stage IV cancer

  • He-Yang Zhang,
  • Hai-Lun Xie,
  • Guo-Tian Ruan,
  • Qi Zhang,
  • Yi-Zhong Ge,
  • Xiao-Yue Liu,
  • Meng Tang,
  • Meng-Meng Song,
  • Shi-Qi Lin,
  • Ming Yang,
  • Xiao-Wei Zhang,
  • Hong-Xia Xu,
  • Chun-Hua Song,
  • Han-Ping Shi

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-022-10145-x
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 22, no. 1
pp. 1 – 11

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Background Systemic inflammation is currently regarded as a hallmark of cancer. This study aimed to accurately clarify the prognostic value of various inflammatory markers in patients with stage IV cancer. Methods This study assessed 2,424 patients with cancer diagnosed with cancer in tumor, node, metastasis (TNM) stage IV. After evaluating the predictive value of 13 inflammatory indicators for patient prognosis using the C index, the lymphocyte C-reactive protein ratio (LCR) was selected to elucidate the prognostic and predictive values in patients with stage IV cancer. Kaplan–Meier and Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to analyze long-term survival. Results A total of 1,457 men (60.1%) and 967 women (39.9%) diagnosed with TNM stage IV cancer were enrolled. A ratio of 2,814 was defined as the optimal cut-off value for the LCR. The LCR was the most accurate prognosis predictor for patients with stage IV cancer among the 13 inflammatory nutritional markers evaluated. The multivariate-adjusted restricted cubic spline plot suggested that LCR had an L-shaped dose–response association with all-cause mortality risk. Patients with lower LCR levels tended to present with worse prognoses. Kaplan–Meier curves and log-rank test results showed that the high LCR groups (LCR ≥ 2,814) exhibited a better prognosis, whereas patients with stage IV cancer of different sex and tumor types (for example, gastrointestinal tumor, non-gastrointestinal tumor, and lung cancer) had a worse survival time. Conclusion The LCR score can be regarded as a stable and useful biomarker to predict prognosis in patients with TNM stage IV compared to other evaluated inflammation indicators.

Keywords