JMIR mHealth and uHealth (Jun 2024)

Cardiac Health Assessment Using a Wearable Device Before and After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation: Prospective Study

  • Rob Eerdekens,
  • Jo Zelis,
  • Herman ter Horst,
  • Caia Crooijmans,
  • Marcel van 't Veer,
  • Danielle Keulards,
  • Marcus Kelm,
  • Gareth Archer,
  • Titus Kuehne,
  • Guus Brueren,
  • Inge Wijnbergen,
  • Nils Johnson,
  • Pim Tonino

DOI
https://doi.org/10.2196/53964
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 12
pp. e53964 – e53964

Abstract

Read online

Abstract BackgroundDue to aging of the population, the prevalence of aortic valve stenosis will increase drastically in upcoming years. Consequently, transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) procedures will also expand worldwide. Optimal selection of patients who benefit with improved symptoms and prognoses is key, since TAVI is not without its risks. Currently, we are not able to adequately predict functional outcomes after TAVI. Quality of life measurement tools and traditional functional assessment tests do not always agree and can depend on factors unrelated to heart disease. Activity tracking using wearable devices might provide a more comprehensive assessment. ObjectiveThis study aimed to identify objective parameters (eg, change in heart rate) associated with improvement after TAVI for severe aortic stenosis from a wearable device. MethodsIn total, 100 patients undergoing routine TAVI wore a Philips Health Watch device for 1 week before and after the procedure. Watch data were analyzed offline—before TAVI for 97 patients and after TAVI for 75 patients. ResultsParameters such as the total number of steps and activity time did not change, in contrast to improvements in the 6-minute walking test (6MWT) and physical limitation domain of the transformed WHOQOL-BREF questionnaire. ConclusionsThese findings, in an older TAVI population, show that watch-based parameters, such as the number of steps, do not change after TAVI, unlike traditional 6MWT and QoL assessments. Basic wearable device parameters might be less appropriate for measuring treatment effects from TAVI.