npj Science of Food (Nov 2024)

The mechanical and sensory signature of plant-based and animal meat

  • Skyler R. St. Pierre,
  • Ethan C. Darwin,
  • Divya Adil,
  • Magaly C. Aviles,
  • Archer Date,
  • Reese A. Dunne,
  • Yanav Lall,
  • María Parra Vallecillo,
  • Valerie A. Perez Medina,
  • Kevin Linka,
  • Marc E. Levenston,
  • Ellen Kuhl

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41538-024-00330-6
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 8, no. 1
pp. 1 – 13

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Eating less meat is associated with a healthier body and planet. Yet, we remain reluctant to switch to a plant-based diet, largely due to the sensory experience of plant-based meat. Food scientists characterize meat using a double compression test, which only probes one-dimensional behavior. Here we use tension, compression, and shear tests–combined with constitutive neural networks–to automatically discover the behavior of eight plant-based and animal meats across the entire three-dimensional spectrum. We find that plant-based sausage and hotdog, with stiffnesses of 95.9 ± 14.1 kPa and 38.7 ± 3.0 kPa, successfully mimic their animal counterparts, with 63.5 ± 45.7 kPa and 44.3 ± 13.2 kPa, while tofurky is twice as stiff, and tofu is twice as soft. Strikingly, a complementary food tasting survey produces in nearly identical stiffness rankings for all eight products (ρ = 0.833, p = 0.015). Probing the fully three-dimensional signature of meats is critical to understand subtle differences in texture that may result in a different perception of taste. Our data and code are freely available at https://github.com/LivingMatterLab/CANN