Kidney International Reports (Jul 2018)

Combining Sensitive Crossmatch Assays With Donor/Recipient Human Leukocyte Antigen Eplet Matching Predicts Living-Donor Kidney Transplant Outcome

  • Maria Meneghini,
  • Edoardo Melilli,
  • Jaume Martorell,
  • Ignacio Revuelta,
  • Elisabet Rigol-Monzó,
  • Anna Manonelles,
  • Nuria Montero,
  • David Cucchiari,
  • Fritz Diekmann,
  • Josep M. Cruzado,
  • Salvador Gil-Vernet,
  • Josep M. Grinyó,
  • Oriol Bestard

Journal volume & issue
Vol. 3, no. 4
pp. 926 – 938

Abstract

Read online

Introduction: Despite the different assays available for immune-risk stratification before living-donor kidney transplantation (LDKT), the precise type and number of tests to perform remain uncertain. Methods: In a cohort of 330 consecutive LDKT patients, all of which were complement-dependent cytotoxicity (CDC)−crossmatch negative, we retrospectively analyzed the impact on main clinical outcomes of most sensitive immunoassays (complement-dependent cytotoxicity−panel-reactive antibody [CDC-PRA], flow cytometry crossmatch [FC-XM], donor-specific antibodies [DSAs], and their complement-binding capacity DSA-C3d]), together with donor/recipient HLA eplet matching. Mean follow-up was 67 months (range 24−190 months). Results: Of 330 patients, 35 (11%) showed a CDC-PRA >20%; 17 (5%) FC-XM+; 30 (9%) DSA+, 18(5%) DSA-C3d+, with low overlapping results (10 patients positive in all donor-specific tests). Unlike HLA allele compatibility, the mean number of HLA class II eplet mismatches was higher in LDKT patients with positive baseline test results. DSA-C3d+ showed higher mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) DSA, with a cut-off MFI of 6192 accurately predicting complement fixation (area under the curve = 0.85, P = 0.008). Although all assays were associated with acute rejection (AR), only DSA-C3d+ (odds ratio [OR] = 6.64, P = 0.038) or high MFI-DSA (OR = 7.54, P = 0.038) independently predicted AR. Likewise, poorly HLA class II eplet−matched patients were at higher risk for AR, particularly patients with negative baseline test results (OR = 1.14, P = 0.019). Finally, previous AR and FC-XM+/DSA+, regardless of C3d positivity, independently predicted graft loss. Conclusion: Combining FC-XM and solid-phase assays with the evaluation of donor/recipient HLA eplet mismatches, are most accurate tools for immune-risk stratification prior LDKT. Keywords: acute rejection, crossmatch immunoassays, donor-specific antibodies, HLA matchmaker, immune risk stratification, living donor kidney transplantation