EFSA Journal (Jan 2023)

Assessment of genetically modified maize GA21 × T25 for food and feed uses, under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 (application EFSA‐GMO‐DE‐2016‐137)

  • EFSA Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms (GMO),
  • Ewen Mullins,
  • Jean‐Louis Bresson,
  • Tamas Dalmay,
  • Ian Crawford Dewhurst,
  • Michelle M Epstein,
  • Leslie George Firbank,
  • Philippe Guerche,
  • Jan Hejatko,
  • Francisco Javier Moreno,
  • Hanspeter Naegeli,
  • Fabien Nogué,
  • Nils Rostoks,
  • Jose Juan Sánchez Serrano,
  • Giovanni Savoini,
  • Eve Veromann,
  • Fabio Veronesi,
  • Fernando Álvarez,
  • Michele Ardizzone,
  • Giacomo De Sanctis,
  • Yann Devos,
  • Silvia Federici,
  • Antonio Fernandez Dumont,
  • Andrea Gennaro,
  • José Ángel Gómez Ruiz,
  • Tilemachos Goumperis,
  • Dafni Maria Kagkli,
  • Anna Lanzoni,
  • Paolo Lenzi,
  • Ana Martin Camargo,
  • Franco Maria Neri,
  • Nikoletta Papadopoulou,
  • Konstantinos Paraskevopoulos,
  • Tommaso Raffaello,
  • Franz Streissl

DOI
https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2023.7729
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 21, no. 1
pp. n/a – n/a

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Genetically modified maize GA21 × T25 was developed by crossing to combine two single events: GA21 and T25. The GMO Panel previously assessed the two single maize events and did not identify safety concerns. No new data on the single maize events were identified that could lead to modification of the original conclusions on their safety. The molecular characterisation, comparative analysis (agronomic, phenotypic and compositional characteristics) and the outcome of the toxicological, allergenicity and nutritional assessment indicate that the combination of the single maize events and of the newly expressed proteins in maize GA21 × T25 does not give rise to food and feed safety and nutritional concerns. The GMO Panel concludes that maize GA21 × T25, as described in this application, is as safe as its conventional counterpart and the non‐GM reference varieties tested, and no post‐market monitoring of food and feed is considered necessary. In the case of accidental release of viable maize GA21 × T25 grains into the environment, this would not raise environmental safety concerns. The post‐market environmental monitoring plan and reporting intervals are in line with the intended uses of maize GA21 × T25. Post‐market monitoring of food and feed is not considered necessary. The GMO Panel concludes that maize GA21 × T25 is as safe as its conventional counterpart and the non‐GM reference varieties tested, with respect to potential effects on human and animal health and the environment.

Keywords