EFSA Journal (May 2020)

Safety evaluation of the food enzyme with 4‐α‐d‐{(1‐>4)‐α‐d‐glucano}trehalose trehalohydrolase and (1‐>4)‐α‐d‐glucan 1‐α‐d‐glucosylmutase activities from the Gryllotalpicola ginsengisoli strain S34

  • EFSA Panel on Food Contact Materials, Enzymes and Processing Aids (CEP),
  • Vittorio Silano,
  • José Manuel Barat Baviera,
  • Claudia Bolognesi,
  • Pier Sandro Cocconcelli,
  • Riccardo Crebelli,
  • David Michael Gott,
  • Konrad Grob,
  • Claude Lambré,
  • Evgenia Lampi,
  • Marcel Mengelers,
  • Alicja Mortensen,
  • Gilles Rivière,
  • Inger‐Lise Steffensen,
  • Christina Tlustos,
  • Henk Van Loveren,
  • Laurence Vernis,
  • Holger Zorn,
  • Boet Glandorf,
  • Lieve Herman,
  • Ana Gomes,
  • Natália Kovalkovičová,
  • Yi Liu,
  • Claudia Roncancio Peña,
  • Andrew Chesson

DOI
https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2020.6042
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 18, no. 5
pp. n/a – n/a

Abstract

Read online

Abstract The food enzyme with 4‐α‐d‐{(1‐>4)‐α‐d‐glucano}trehalose trehalohydrolase ((4‐α‐d‐[(1,4‐α‐d‐glucano]trehalose glucanohydrolase (trehalose‐producing)), EC 3.2.1.141) and (1‐>4)‐α‐d‐glucan 1‐α‐d‐glucosylmutase ((1,4)‐α‐d‐glucan 1‐α‐d‐glucosylmutase, EC 5.4.99.15) activities is produced with a non‐genetically modified microorganism Gryllotalpicola ginsengisoli (formally Arthrobacter ramosus) by Hayashibara Co., Ltd. The applicant states that the food enzyme will not be placed on the open market, but will only be used in‐house in starch processing for trehalose production. Since residual amounts of total organic solids are removed by the purification steps applied during the production of trehalose, toxicological studies were considered not necessary and no dietary exposure was calculated. Similarities of the amino acid sequences to those of known allergens were searched and no matches were found. The Panel considered that, under the intended conditions of use, the risk of allergic sensitisation and elicitation reactions by dietary exposure cannot be excluded, but the likelihood to occur is considered to be low. Based on the data provided, the Panel concluded that the food enzyme does not give rise to safety concerns under the intended conditions of use.

Keywords