npj Vaccines (Mar 2023)

Immune correlates analysis of a phase 3 trial of the AZD1222 (ChAdOx1 nCoV-19) vaccine

  • David Benkeser,
  • Youyi Fong,
  • Holly E. Janes,
  • Elizabeth J. Kelly,
  • Ian Hirsch,
  • Stephanie Sproule,
  • Ann Marie Stanley,
  • Jill Maaske,
  • Tonya Villafana,
  • Christopher R. Houchens,
  • Karen Martins,
  • Lakshmi Jayashankar,
  • Flora Castellino,
  • Victor Ayala,
  • Christos J. Petropoulos,
  • Andrew Leith,
  • Deanne Haugaard,
  • Bill Webb,
  • Yiwen Lu,
  • Chenchen Yu,
  • Bhavesh Borate,
  • Lars W. P. van der Laan,
  • Nima S. Hejazi,
  • Lindsay N. Carpp,
  • April K. Randhawa,
  • Michele P. Andrasik,
  • James G. Kublin,
  • Margaret Brewinski Isaacs,
  • Mamodikoe Makhene,
  • Tina Tong,
  • Merlin L. Robb,
  • Lawrence Corey,
  • Kathleen M. Neuzil,
  • Dean Follmann,
  • Corey Hoffman,
  • Ann R. Falsey,
  • Magdalena Sobieszczyk,
  • Richard A. Koup,
  • Ruben O. Donis,
  • Peter B. Gilbert,
  • on behalf of the AstraZeneca AZD1222 Clinical Study Group,
  • the Immune Assays Team,
  • the United States Government (USG)/CoVPN Biostatistics Team

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41541-023-00630-0
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 8, no. 1
pp. 1 – 13

Abstract

Read online

Abstract In the phase 3 trial of the AZD1222 (ChAdOx1 nCoV-19) vaccine conducted in the U.S., Chile, and Peru, anti-spike binding IgG concentration (spike IgG) and pseudovirus 50% neutralizing antibody titer (nAb ID50) measured four weeks after two doses were assessed as correlates of risk and protection against PCR-confirmed symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection (COVID-19). These analyses of SARS-CoV-2 negative participants were based on case-cohort sampling of vaccine recipients (33 COVID-19 cases by 4 months post dose two, 463 non-cases). The adjusted hazard ratio of COVID-19 was 0.32 (95% CI: 0.14, 0.76) per 10-fold increase in spike IgG concentration and 0.28 (0.10, 0.77) per 10-fold increase in nAb ID50 titer. At nAb ID50 below the limit of detection (< 2.612 IU50/ml), 10, 100, and 270 IU50/ml, vaccine efficacy was −5.8% (−651%, 75.6%), 64.9% (56.4%, 86.9%), 90.0% (55.8%, 97.6%) and 94.2% (69.4%, 99.1%). These findings provide further evidence towards defining an immune marker correlate of protection to help guide regulatory/approval decisions for COVID-19 vaccines.