EFSA Journal (Jun 2022)

Commodity risk assessment of Prunus domestica plants from Ukraine

  • EFSA Panel on Plant Health (PLH),
  • Claude Bragard,
  • Elisavet Chatzivassiliou,
  • Katharina Dehnen‐Schmutz,
  • Paula Baptista,
  • Paolo Gonthier,
  • Marie‐Agnès Jacques,
  • Josep Anton Jaques Miret,
  • Annemarie Fejer Justesen,
  • Alan MacLeod,
  • Christer Sven Magnusson,
  • Panagiotis Milonas,
  • Juan A Navas‐Cortes,
  • Stephen Parnell,
  • Roel Potting,
  • Philippe L Reignault,
  • Emilio Stefani,
  • Hans‐Hermann Thulke,
  • Wopke Van der Werf,
  • Antonio Vicent,
  • Lucia Zappalà,
  • Andrea Lucchi,
  • Pedro Gómez,
  • Gregor Urek,
  • Umberto Bernardo,
  • Giovanni Bubici,
  • Anna Vittoria Carluccio,
  • Michela Chiumenti,
  • Francesco Di Serio,
  • Elena Fanelli,
  • Cristina Marzachì,
  • Ciro Gardi,
  • Olaf Mosbach‐Schulz,
  • Eduardo de la Peña,
  • Jonathan Yuen

DOI
https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7391
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 20, no. 6
pp. n/a – n/a

Abstract

Read online

Abstract The European Commission requested the EFSA Panel on Plant Health to prepare and deliver risk assessments for commodities listed in Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/2019 as ‘High risk plants, plant products and other objects’. This Scientific Opinion covers plant health risks posed by plants of Prunus domestica grafted on Prunus cerasifera imported from Ukraine, taking into account the available scientific information, including the technical information provided by Ukraine. All pests associated with the commodity were evaluated against specific criteria for their relevance for this opinion. One quarantine pest (Lopholeucaspis japonica), two protected zone quarantine pests (Erwinia amylovora and Xanthomonas arboricola pv. pruni) and one non‐regulated pest (Eotetranychus prunicola) that fulfilled all relevant criteria were selected for further evaluation. For these four pests, the risk mitigation measures proposed in the technical dossier from Ukraine were evaluated taking into account the possible limiting factors. For the selected pests, an expert judgement is given on the likelihood of pest freedom taking into consideration the risk mitigation measures acting on the pest, including uncertainties associated with the assessment. The degree of pest freedom varies among the pests evaluated, with Xanthomonas arboricola pv. pruni being the pest most frequently expected on the imported plants. The Expert Knowledge Elicitation indicated with 95% certainty that between 9,870 and 10,000 bundles (consisting of 10 plants each) per 10,000 would be free from Xanthomonas arboricola pv. pruni.

Keywords