EFSA Journal (Dec 2016)

Re‐evaluation of agar (E 406) as a food additive

  • EFSA Panel on Food Additives and Nutrient Sources added to Food (ANS),
  • Alicja Mortensen,
  • Fernando Aguilar,
  • Riccardo Crebelli,
  • Alessandro Di Domenico,
  • Maria Jose Frutos,
  • Pierre Galtier,
  • David Gott,
  • Ursula Gundert‐Remy,
  • Claude Lambré,
  • Jean‐Charles Leblanc,
  • Oliver Lindtner,
  • Peter Moldeus,
  • Pasquale Mosesso,
  • Agneta Oskarsson,
  • Dominique Parent‐Massin,
  • Ivan Stankovic,
  • Ine Waalkens‐Berendsen,
  • Rudolf Antonius Woutersen,
  • Matthew Wright,
  • Maged Younes,
  • Leon Brimer,
  • Paul Peters,
  • Jacqueline Wiesner,
  • Anna Christodoulidou,
  • Federica Lodi,
  • Alexandra Tard,
  • Birgit Dusemund

DOI
https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2016.4645
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 14, no. 12
pp. n/a – n/a

Abstract

Read online

Abstract The EFSA Panel on Food Additives and Nutrient Sources added to Food (ANS) provides a scientific opinion re‐evaluating the safety of agar (E 406) as a food additive. In the European Union (EU), agar (E 406) has been evaluated by the Scientific Committee for Food (SCF) in 1989, who allocated to agar a not specified acceptable daily intake (ADI), and by the Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives (JECFA) in 1974, who considered very few data to conclude to a not limited ADI. According to the conceptual framework for the risk assessment of certain food additives re‐evaluated under Commission Regulation (EU) No 257/2010, the Panel considered that the safety assessment is limited to the use and use levels received from industry in 7 food categories for which data were considered in this opinion out of the 70 food categories in which agar (E 406) is authorised; an indicative high refined exposure assessment up to 26 mg/kg body weight (bw) per day has been calculated in toddlers at the 95th percentile (non‐brand‐loyal scenario); agar is unlikely to be absorbed unchanged and slightly fermented by intestinal microbiota; sufficient toxicity data were available; there was no concern with respect to the genotoxicity of agar; no carcinogenic effects were reported in carcinogenicity studies in mice and rats at the doses of 4,500 mg/kg bw per day and 2,500 mg/kg bw per day, respectively, the highest doses tested; oral intake of agar (4,500 mg/person corresponding to 64 mg/kg bw per day) was tolerated in humans for 12 weeks without noticeable side effects. Therefore, the Panel concluded that there is no need for a numerical ADI for agar and that there is no safety concern for the general population at the refined exposure assessment for the reported uses of agar as a food additive.

Keywords