EFSA Journal (Jul 2025)

Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance halosulfuron‐methyl

  • European Food Safety Authority (EFSA),
  • Fernando Álvarez,
  • Maria Arena,
  • Domenica Auteri,
  • Sofia Batista Leite,
  • Marco Binaglia,
  • Anna Federica Castoldi,
  • Arianna Chiusolo,
  • Angelo Colagiorgi,
  • Mathilde Colas,
  • Federica Crivellente,
  • Chloe De Lentdecker,
  • Isabella De Magistris,
  • Mark Egsmose,
  • Gabriella Fait,
  • Franco Ferilli,
  • Monica Fittipaldi Broussard,
  • German Giner Santonja,
  • Varvara Gouliarmou,
  • Katrin Halling,
  • Alessio Ippolito,
  • Frederique Istace,
  • Samira Jarrah,
  • Dimitra Kardassi,
  • Aude Kienzler,
  • Anna Lanzoni,
  • Roberto Lava,
  • Renata Leuschner,
  • Alberto Linguadoca,
  • Jochem Louisse,
  • Christopher Lythgo,
  • Oriol Magrans,
  • Iris Mangas,
  • Silvia Mazzega,
  • Andrea Mioč,
  • Ileana Miron,
  • Tunde Molnar,
  • Laura Padovani,
  • Vincenzo Padricello,
  • Martina Panzarea,
  • Juan Manuel Parra Morte,
  • Simone Rizzuto,
  • Miguel Santos,
  • Rositsa Serafimova,
  • Rachel Sharp,
  • Csaba Szentes,
  • Anne Theobald,
  • Manuela Tiramani,
  • Giorgia Vianello,
  • Laura Villamar‐Bouza

DOI
https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2025.9504
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 23, no. 7
pp. n/a – n/a

Abstract

Read online

Abstract The conclusions of the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) following the peer review of the initial risk assessments carried out by the competent authorities of the rapporteur Member State Italy and co‐rapporteur Member State Poland for the pesticide active substance halosulfuron‐methyl are reported. The context of the peer review was that required by Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 844/2012, as amended by Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 2020/103. The conclusions were reached on the basis of the evaluation of the representative use of halosulfuron‐methyl as a herbicide in rice crops. The reliable endpoints, appropriate for use in regulatory risk assessment, are presented. Missing information identified as being required by the regulatory framework is listed. Concerns are identified.

Keywords