EFSA Journal (Mar 2017)

Update of the list of QPS‐recommended biological agents intentionally added to food or feed as notified to EFSA 5: suitability of taxonomic units notified to EFSA until September 2016

  • EFSA Panel on Biological Hazards (BIOHAZ),
  • Antonia Ricci,
  • Ana Allende,
  • Declan Bolton,
  • Marianne Chemaly,
  • Robert Davies,
  • Rosina Girones,
  • Kostas Koutsoumanis,
  • Lieve Herman,
  • Roland Lindqvist,
  • Birgit Nørrung,
  • Lucy Robertson,
  • Giuseppe Ru,
  • Moez Sanaa,
  • Marion Simmons,
  • Panagiotis Skandamis,
  • Emma Snary,
  • Niko Speybroeck,
  • Benno Ter Kuile,
  • John Threlfall,
  • Helene Wahlström,
  • Pier Sandro Cocconcelli,
  • Günter Klein (deceased),
  • Luisa Peixe,
  • Miguel Prieto Maradona,
  • Amparo Querol,
  • Juan Evaristo Suarez,
  • Ingvar Sundh,
  • Just Vlak,
  • Sandra Correia,
  • Pablo Salvador Fernández Escámez

DOI
https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2017.4663
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 15, no. 3
pp. n/a – n/a

Abstract

Read online

Abstract EFSA was requested to assess the safety of a broad range of biological agents in the context of notifications for market authorisation as sources of food and feed additives, enzymes and plant protection products. The qualified presumption of safety (QPS) assessment was developed to provide a harmonised generic pre‐assessment to support safety risk assessments performed by EFSA's Scientific Panels. The safety of unambiguously defined biological agents (at the highest taxonomic unit appropriate for the purpose for which an application is intended) and the completeness of the body of knowledge were assessed. Safety concerns identified for a taxonomic unit are, where possible and reasonable in number, reflected as ‘qualifications’ in connection with a recommendation for a QPS status. A total of 57 biological agents were notified to EFSA between the end of April 2016 and the beginning of September 2016. From these, 34 biological agents already had a QPS status and did not require further evaluation, and 10 were not included in the evaluation as they are filamentous fungi or enterococci, biological groups which have been excluded from QPS evaluation since 2014. Three notifications for Streptomyces violaceoruber, one for Streptomyces albus, one for Bacillus circulans and four for Escherichia coli were not evaluated for QPS status because these species were recently assessed and considered not suitable for QPS status. Therefore, only four notifications related to three taxonomic units were evaluated for QPS status. Of these, Arthrobacter ramosus and Pseudomonas fluorescens are not recommended for the QPS list. Bacillus smithii is recommended for the QPS status.

Keywords