Police operational independence and the rule of law in Canada: Improving police governance and accountability

Abstract

The operational independence of the police is a crucial yet often misunderstood aspect of the rule of law in Canada. It is a quasi-constitutional principle established by key court decisions, particularly the Supreme Court of Canada’s ruling in R. v. Campbell (1999). While police boards set significant policy directions, they must avoid intervening in specific operational matters like investigations and arrests, which fall solely under police jurisdiction. This study highlights the delicate balance police must maintain between accountability to police service boards and government, and independence in certain operational decisions to prevent politicization while remaining connected to the communities they serve. Focusing on municipal policing, this report emphasizes the independent role of municipal police agencies in law enforcement, while recognizing their need to collaborate with local governments and police service boards on policy, strategic, and occasionally operational issues. Together, these entities form the police governance and accountability ecosystem. When functioning effectively, this system fosters ethical decision-making and bolsters community confidence; however, when imbalanced, it can erode trust and facilitate misconduct. Thus, it is crucial for all parties to grasp the principles of police operational independence. This report clarifies Canadian jurisprudence on police operational independence, addressing existing gaps in understanding and application among police, boards, and government officials. It synthesizes established legal frameworks and insights from significant inquiries, bolstered by a comprehensive interview program conducted for this study.

Keywords

• police operational independence
• accountability
• governance
• influence
• interference
• rule of law