Maternal and Child Nutrition (Oct 2022)

Understanding the effects of nutrition‐sensitive agriculture interventions with participatory videos and women's group meetings on maternal and child nutrition in rural Odisha, India: A mixed‐methods process evaluation

  • Audrey Prost,
  • Helen Harris‐Fry,
  • Satyanarayan Mohanty,
  • Manoj Parida,
  • Sneha Krishnan,
  • Emily Fivian,
  • Suchitra Rath,
  • Nirmala Nair,
  • Naba K. Mishra,
  • Shibanath Padhan,
  • Ronali Pradhan,
  • Satyapriya Sahu,
  • Jolene Skordis,
  • Heather Danton,
  • Peggy Koniz‐Booher,
  • Emma Beaumont,
  • Philip James,
  • Elizabeth Allen,
  • Diana Elbourne,
  • Suneetha Kadiyala

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/mcn.13398
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 18, no. 4
pp. n/a – n/a

Abstract

Read online

Abstract A trial of three nutrition‐sensitive agriculture interventions with participatory videos and women's group meetings in rural Odisha, India, found improvements in maternal and child dietary diversity, limited effects on agricultural production, and no effects on women and children's nutritional status. Our process evaluation explored fidelity, reach, and mechanisms behind interventions' effects. We also examined how context affected implementation, mechanisms, and outcomes. We used data from intervention monitoring systems, review notes, trial surveys, 32 case studies with families (n = 91 family members), and 20 group discussions with women's group members and intervention workers (n = 181 and 32, respectively). We found that interventions were implemented with high fidelity. Groups reached around half of the mothers of children under 2 years. Videos and meetings increased women's knowledge, motivation and confidence to suggest or make changes to their diets and agricultural production. Families responded in diverse ways. Many adopted or improved rainfed homestead garden cultivation for consumption, which could explain gains in maternal and child dietary diversity seen in the impact evaluation. Cultivation for income was less common. This was often due to small landholdings, poor access to irrigation and decision‐making dominated by men. Interventions helped change norms about heavy work during pregnancy, but young women with little family support still did considerable work. Women's ability to shape cultivation, income and workload decisions was strongly influenced by support from male relatives. Future nutrition‐sensitive agriculture interventions could include additional flexibility to address families’ land, water, labour and time constraints, as well as actively engage with spouses and in‐laws.

Keywords