Food & Nutrition Research (Mar 2024)

Defining malnutrition in persons with spinal cord injury – does the Global Criteria for Malnutrition work?

  • Hanne Bjørg Slettahjell,
  • Maria Bastakis,
  • Fin Biering-Sørensen,
  • Vegard Strøm,
  • Christine Henriksen

DOI
https://doi.org/10.29219/fnr.v68.9989
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 68
pp. 1 – 12

Abstract

Read online

Background and aims: Physiologic and metabolic changes following spinal cord injury (SCI) lead to an increased risk of malnutrition. The Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition (GLIM) is a three-step approach to diagnose malnutrition: 1) screening; 2) phenotypic and etiological criteria; and 3) malnutrition severity. The main aim of this study was to assess malnutrition in patients with SCI, according to the GLIM criteria. Methods: Patients with SCI (≥ 18 years) admitted to rehabilitation were included. Anthropometrics, food intake, and inflammation were assessed on admission. Fat-free mass index (FFMI) was estimated from bioimpedance analysis. Malnutrition was diagnosed by the GLIM criteria, using the Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool (MUST) as the first step screening tool. Sensitivity and specificity analyses were performed. Results: In total, 66 patients were assessed (50 men) with a mean age of 51.4 (± 17.4) years and median time since injury was 37.5 (10–450) days. The mean body mass index was 24.7 (± 4.2) kg/m2, and 1-month involuntary weight loss was 5.7 (± 4.4)%. FFMI for men was 17.3 (± 1.9) and for women 15.3 (± 1.6) kg/m2. Forty-one patients (62%) were malnourished according to the GLIM criteria: 27 moderately and 14 severely malnourished. MUST was not able to detect malnutrition risk of nine patients, giving a moderate agreement (kappa 0.66), with a sensitivity of 0.78 and a specificity of 0.92 compared to the GLIM diagnosis. Conclusions: In this cross-sectional study, 62% of subacute SCI patients were malnourished according to the GLIM criteria. The screening tool MUST showed moderate agreement with the GLIM criteria and did not detect risk of all patients with a malnutrition diagnosis. The clinical implications of these findings need further investigation.

Keywords