Petroleum Exploration and Development (Oct 2021)

Limits and grading evaluation criteria of tight oil reservoirs in typical continental basins of China

  • Nengwu ZHOU,
  • Shuangfang LU,
  • Min WANG,
  • Wenbiao HUANG,
  • Dianshi XIAO,
  • Chenxue JIAO,
  • Jingming WANG,
  • Weichao TIAN,
  • Lei ZHOU,
  • Fangwen CHEN,
  • Wei LIU,
  • Zhixuan WANG

Journal volume & issue
Vol. 48, no. 5
pp. 1089 – 1100

Abstract

Read online

Based on the microscopic pore-throat characterization of typical continental tight reservoirs in China, such as sandstone of Cretaceous Qingshankou and Quantou formations in Songliao Basin, NE China sandy conglomerate of Baikouquan Formation in Mahu area and hybrid rock of Lucaogou Formation in Jimusaer sag of Junggar Basin, NE China the theoretical lower limit, oil accumulation lower limit, effective flow lower limit and the upper limit of tight oil reservoirs were defined by water film thickness method, oil bearing occurrence method, oil testing productivity method and mechanical balance method, respectively. Cluster analysis method was used to compare the differences in pore-throat structure of different tight reservoirs, determine the grading criterion of tight reservoirs, and analyze its correlation with the limit of reservoir formation. The results show that the boundary between tight reservoir and conventional reservoir corresponds to the upper limit of physical properties, the boundary of class II and class III tight reservoirs corresponds to the lower limit of effective flow, the boundary of class III and class IV tight reservoirs corresponds to the lower limit of reservoir forming, and the theoretical lower limit of tight reservoir corresponds to the boundary between tight reservoir and non-reservoir. Finally, the application results of the grading evaluation criterion show that the tight oil productivity is highly controlled by the type of tight reservoir, and class I and class II tight reservoirs are the favorable sections for high production of tight oil.

Keywords