EFSA Journal (May 2022)

Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance Purpureocillium lilacinum strain PL11

  • European Food Safety Authority (EFSA),
  • Maria Anastassiadou,
  • Maria Arena,
  • Domenica Auteri,
  • Alba Brancato,
  • Laszlo Bura,
  • Luis Carrasco Cabrera,
  • Anna Castoldi,
  • Eugenia Chaideftou,
  • Arianna Chiusolo,
  • Federica Crivellente,
  • Chloe De Lentdecker,
  • Mark Egsmose,
  • Gabriella Fait,
  • Luna Greco,
  • Alessio Ippolito,
  • Frederique Istace,
  • Samira Jarrah,
  • Dimitra Kardassi,
  • Renata Leuschner,
  • Alfonso Lostia,
  • Christopher Lythgo,
  • Oriol Magrans,
  • Iris Mangas,
  • Ileana Miron,
  • Tunde Molnar,
  • Laura Padovani,
  • Juan Manuel Parra Morte,
  • Ragnor Pedersen,
  • Hermine Reich,
  • Miguel Santos,
  • Rachel Sharp,
  • Csaba Szentes,
  • Andrea Terron,
  • Manuela Tiramani,
  • Benedicte Vagenende,
  • Laura Villamar‐Bouza

DOI
https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2022.6393
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 20, no. 5
pp. n/a – n/a

Abstract

Read online

Abstract The conclusions of the EFSA following the peer review of the initial risk assessments carried out by the competent authority of the rapporteur Member State, the United Kingdom, for the pesticide active substance Purpureocillium lilacinum strain PL11 and the considerations as regards the inclusion of the substance in Annex IV of Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 are reported. The context of the peer review was that required by Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council. The conclusions were reached on the basis of the evaluation of the representative uses of Purpureocillium lilacinum strain PL11 as nematicide on tomato, pepper, aubergine, cucumber, courgette, melon, watermelon, pumpkin (field and greenhouse applications). The reliable endpoints appropriate for use in regulatory risk assessment are presented. Missing information identified as being required by the regulatory framework is listed.

Keywords