EFSA Journal (Feb 2023)

Safety and efficacy of a feed additive consisting of copper(II)‐betaine complex for all animal species (Biochem Zusatzstoffe Handels‐ und Produktionsges. mbH)

  • EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP),
  • Vasileios Bampidis,
  • Giovanna Azimonti,
  • Maria de Lourdes Bastos,
  • Henrik Christensen,
  • Birgit Dusemund,
  • Mojca Durjava,
  • Maryline Kouba,
  • Marta López‐Alonso,
  • Secundino López Puente,
  • Francesca Marcon,
  • Baltasar Mayo,
  • Alena Pechová,
  • Mariana Petkova,
  • Fernando Ramos,
  • Yolanda Sanz,
  • Roberto Edoardo Villa,
  • Ruud Woutersen,
  • Antonio Finizio,
  • Thomas Poiger,
  • Ivana Teodorović,
  • Angelica Amaduzzi,
  • Montserrat Anguita,
  • Jaume Galobart,
  • Matteo Lorenzo Innocenti,
  • Paola Manini,
  • Jordi Ortuño,
  • Fabiola Pizzo,
  • Jordi Tarrés‐Call,
  • Maria Vittoria Vettori,
  • Anita Radovnikovic

DOI
https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2023.7817
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 21, no. 2
pp. n/a – n/a

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Following a request from the European Commission, the EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP Panel) was asked to deliver a scientific opinion on the safety and efficacy of a copper(II)‐betaine complex as nutritional feed additive for all animal species. Based on the results of a tolerance study carried out in chicken, the FEEDAP Panel concluded that the additive is safe for chickens for fattening when used up to the current maximum authorised levels of copper in feed; this conclusion was extrapolated to all animal species and categories at the respective maximum copper levels in complete feed authorised in the European Union. The FEEDAP Panel concluded that the use of the copper(II)‐betaine complex in animal nutrition at the maximum copper levels authorised for the animal species poses no concern to the safety of consumers. Regarding the safety for the environment, the use of the additive in feed for terrestrial animals and land‐based aquaculture is considered safe under proposed conditions of use. The data available do not allow the conclusion to be made on the safety of the additive for marine sediment when it is used in sea cages. The additive is not a skin irritant, but it is an irritant to the eyes. Due to the traces of nickel, the additive is considered to be a respiratory and skin sensitiser. The Panel could not conclude on the efficacy of the product.

Keywords