JMIR mHealth and uHealth (Jul 2015)

Mobile Phone-Connected Wearable Motion Sensors to Assess Postoperative Mobilization

  • Appelboom, Geoff,
  • Taylor, Blake E,
  • Bruce, Eliza,
  • Bassile, Clare C,
  • Malakidis, Corinna,
  • Yang, Annie,
  • Youngerman, Brett,
  • D'Amico, Randy,
  • Bruce, Sam,
  • Bruyère, Olivier,
  • Reginster, Jean-Yves,
  • Dumont, Emmanuel PL,
  • Connolly Jr, E Sander

DOI
https://doi.org/10.2196/mhealth.3785
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 3, no. 3
p. e78

Abstract

Read online

BackgroundEarly mobilization after surgery reduces the incidence of a wide range of complications. Wearable motion sensors measure movements over time and transmit this data wirelessly, which has the potential to monitor patient recovery and encourages patients to engage in their own rehabilitation. ObjectiveWe sought to determine the ability of off-the-shelf activity sensors to remotely monitor patient postoperative mobility. MethodsConsecutive subjects were recruited under the Department of Neurosurgery at Columbia University. Patients were enrolled during physical therapy sessions. The total number of steps counted by the two blinded researchers was compared to the steps recorded on four activity sensors positioned at different body locations. ResultsA total of 148 motion data points were generated. The start time, end time, and duration of each walking session were accurately recorded by the devices and were remotely available for the researchers to analyze. The sensor accuracy was significantly greater when placed over the ankles than over the hips (P<.001). Our multivariate analysis showed that step length was an independent predictor of sensor accuracy. On linear regression, there was a modest positive correlation between increasing step length and increased ankle sensor accuracy (r=.640, r2=.397) that reached statistical significance on the multivariate model (P=.03). Increased gait speed also correlated with increased ankle sensor accuracy, although less strongly (r=.444, r2=.197). We did not note an effect of unilateral weakness on the accuracy of left- versus right-sided sensors. Accuracy was also affected by several specific measures of a patient’s level of physical assistance, for which we generated a model to mathematically adjust for systematic underestimation as well as disease severity. ConclusionsWe provide one of the first assessments of the accuracy and utility of widely available and wirelessly connected activity sensors in a postoperative patient population. Our results show that activity sensors are able to provide invaluable information about a patient’s mobility status and can transmit this data wirelessly, although there is a systematic underestimation bias in more debilitated patients.